On Jan 13, 8:08 am, François Bissey <f.r.bis...@massey.ac.nz> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:35:16 Craig Citro wrote:
>
> > > If you work on getting this merged upstream as a bug that's a good
> > > selling point for us. We can produce a patched ebuild and possibly
> > > get it accepted.
> > > Do you have a bug tracking number of some kind for it?
>
> > I just submitted the bug:
>
> >http://bugs.python.org/issue7689
>
> > I'll let you know as I hear anything. (I know one of the corePython
> > devs has a standing offer that he'll review a patch if you review 5 of
> > his; if I don't hear anything in a week or so, I'll just bite the
> > bullet and get this reviewed that way.)
>
> > -cc
>
> That's quite good already I can open a bug in Gentoo, quote that
> bug and put a patched ebuild in the sage-on-gentoo overlay.
> There are more chances of it being included in the main tree if there is a bug
> upstream and a need for it in Gentoo.

  Hi,

  Sorry for pestering :-)

  What is the current state of this problem?

  Any chances this will get accepted by upstream? (Currently I need
that to patch
Mandriva's python package).

> Thanks,
> Francois

Paulo

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to