On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Ralf Hemmecke <hemme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > today, running "./sage -t filename" did not succeed on my system. After > a while, I could figure out with some help of Burcin that my setup of > sage was too much using symbolic links. In fact, after I removed "sage" > from being available via PATH, the above command succeeded. > > Since that is not the first time I run into that problem, I started to > write two SEPs. > > http://wiki.sagemath.org/AutoToolsSEP
For the reasons Robert Bradshaw mentioned, I don't think the AutoTools SEP makes a lot of sense for Sage. > http://wiki.sagemath.org/UnifiedCommandLineSEP Perhaps this has already been adequately addressed by recent work of John Palmieri: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/21 > > I'd be happy if some of you could comment on it and improve that pages. > Before any implementation starts, there should be a clearer specification. > -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
