> >>ordering, I'm just suggesting that since there is an inconsistent > >> definition of < for Sage sets, and since they get used frequently as > >> vertices, that we define atotalordering. You yourself admitted that > >> you can't think of a natural mathematical meaning for < for arbitrary > >> sets...
If you guys become interested in total ordering in the future: www.daimi.au.dk/~gudmund/dynamicF04/vEB.pdf -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
