On 2010-12-05 23:17, John H Palmieri wrote: > On Dec 5, 2:00 pm, Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be> wrote: >> On 2010-12-05 18:37, John H Palmieri wrote: >> >>> What's the difference? Right now we never call pipestatus with >>> arguments in this form, do we? >> >> Actually we do in the "make build" rule: >> $(PIPE) "cd spkg && ./install all 2>&1" "tee -a ../install.log" > > Oh, you're right. Would it be better just to specify an absolute > pathname? Or to use "tee -a install.log" but to add parentheses or > something to make it clearer how the commands are to be parsed?
In #10339, I have implemented writing "tee -a install.log" and changing the behaviour of pipestatus such that pipestatus "A && B" "C" acts like (A && B) | C. Jeroen. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
