On Feb 21, 2:00 am, Eviatar <eviatarb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've noticed this too. I wonder if they purposely implemented Sage > syntax or if it's just a very comprehensive parser.
I think the goal is to understand any natural syntax for many questions, and certainly this syntax is relatively unambiguous, and pretty much the Maxima (i.e. old and well-known) syntax in the first case. It tries to also understand much more 'natural' things like "the integral of ... with respect to x" etc. so I don't see any need to impute any extra thought on this. - kcrisman -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
