2011/4/11 Dr. David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net>: > The latest stable release of gcc is 4.6.0. Does anyone know of any problems > building Sage apart from these 4 I am aware of. > > 1) Singular fails to build > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11084
It is working for me in Mandriva, but in Mandriva it should be building with -O2 (using mostly default rpm build options), so, -O3 may be showing some compiler problem. > 2) Lcalc fails to build > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10892 > (merged in sage-4.7.alpha4 ) I just if 0'ed all lcalc_to_double functions and defined a macro that casts the argument to double... > 3) PolyBoRi fails to build on Solaris > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11083 > (merged in sage-4.7.alpha4 ) Compiles cleanly on Mandriva. > 4) Rubiks failing a doctest on Solaris > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11168 > (needs review). doctest works, but, for testing purposes I am using, sage 4.6.2, singular and polybori rebuilt with gcc 4.6.0, and lcalc with minor patch and rebuilt with gcc 4.6.0. Most other packages were not yet rebuilt with newer gcc. > On what systems have people checked Sage with gcc 4.6.0? > > I doubt anyone will escape the first two of these bugs if using gcc 4.6.0. > The third is definitely going to be specific to Solaris. The fourth might > show up on other platforms, though I've only seen it with OpenSolaris. > > Has anyone tried gcc 4.6.0 on OS X?? Paulo -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
