On Jun 14, 7:49 pm, Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be> wrote: > On 2011-06-10 18:22, Robert Bradshaw wrote:> Maybe pending? Is this for > positively reviewed tickets? > [...] > > Is "needs-info" insufficient. > > I think that "needs_info" means something different and is actually > quite close to "needs_work". For example, there might be something > wrong with the patch but it's not completely clear that there is > actually something wrong. I also use "needs_info" for missing > Author/Reviewer names.
Yep. To me "needs info" means either the reviewer or the author(s) cannot further proceed with the ticket without some direct response from the author(s) or the reviewer, respectively. It doesn't necessarily imply the need for "real" work (on the patches, spkgs etc.); often the ticket's status is simply reverted to "positive review" or "needs review" after an answer has been given. -leif -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
