Very nice! Several suggestions - that are just that, suggestions. I'd move "matrices" to be right next to "linear algebra." Maybe include .characteristic_polynomial() in the linear algebra section.
I don't see ".diameter()" anywhere. A section on "constructions"? You have "products", but there are other ways to make new graphs, such as the line graph. You could do a "properties" section. .is_forest(), .is_interval(), .is_regular(), some selection of the most important of the ".is_" methods you do not have already in other places. As Minh said, a handful of pre-built graphs, either useful infinite families, or one-off classic examples, would be a good addition. A couple of graphics would make it more visually appealing. Maybe some information on plotting (which is sometimes confusing). You could give an example plot command, and include the resulting output/ graphic (hopefully without cut-off vertices). Where you have "graph." repeatedly, you could probably use "G." and save yourself a bit of room on each line. And I'd think something like G.is_isomorphic(H) would be apparent to most readers, especially when the roles of G and H are interchangeable. When I did one of these for linear algebra, I did not try to be too precise about all of the data types and options, unless it was a frequent "gotcha" or a key feature. I had just a small section on "help", things like tab-completion, which you could recycle in this if you wished. Rob -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
