Let me see if I understand this right. You are campaigning to have bug lists available (sure, why keep them secret?). My claim is that in practice this is not as useful as one might initially think. Now it appears that Sage Days 32 is sponsored by an anonymous company (or secret agency?). It seems to me that having a secret sponsor would be kind of unnerving to some participants.
And if some money is being spent on debugging, how does that money flow to (say) PARI developers? -- To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
