Helloooooooooooo !!!! Today I saw a blog post (http://mat.tepper.cmu.edu/blog/?p=1617) about > finding a Hamiltonian path through the states of the continental US. I >
Hmmm... Does not look like something Sage can not break :-) > see we have graphs.WorldMap; perhaps we should have graphs for US > states. Well, I do not know if we really *should* have it (like WorldMap which is not a very fundamental part of the graph library to begin with) but the idea is fun which is a more than sufficient counter-argument :-D > We'd probably want several graphs -- all 50 states, continental US, > with/without Washington DC. I don't know what good names for them would > be or how to put them into the (already huge) graphs.* namespace. > Hmmm... Well, unless somebody has a great idea to store them in a easy-to-use database, we could stick with the current version. Perhaps creating a "maps" object in graph_generators so that they can be listed this way ? graphs.maps.WorldMap(world = "US") Ahem. No, rather graphs.maps.WorldMap() graphs.maps.USMap() As I do not thing we will ever have all of Google Map's data inside of Sage's graph library, just storing them inside of a "folder" seems good enough, doesn't it ? :-) Nathann > -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
