On 02/ 8/12 09:11 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-02-08 16:37, David Kirkby wrote:
Unfortunately, due to what appears to be a bug with Pynac, importing a
lot of python modules, 64-bit binaries on Solaris do not run well.
So, if I understand you correctly, Sage *builds* but it doesn't actually
work properly?  I actually meant "builds and runs as it should" with
SAGE64=yes in my original question.

I believe Sage builds and runs as it should on some older releases of OS X, where the default was to build 32-bit binaries. So if you want to test it, find out what versions of OS X have this property, and test on that.



SAGE64 was first introduced when Micheal decided to port Sage to OS X - despite the fact he was paid to get it working on Solaris! So all early code had something like

if [ `uname` = Darwin ] -a [ $SAGE64 = yes ] ; then
...

I went around removing the references to Darwin (OS X).

So unless someone comes up with something better, I think SAGE64 should
not be altered.
My main problem is testing SAGE64.  If some new spkg breaks a SAGE64
build, nobody is going to notice.  Most authors and reviewers (including
me) are unable to test whether SAGE64 really works.

I believe William is going to switch on t2.math. In which case, you can test the building on that. However, Sage wont run properly until someone fixes the fact Pynac is calling modules which are not initialised

http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11116

So unless the pynac issue is resolved, the best you can do on Solaris SPARC is test Sage builds with SAGE64 set to yes. (R still presents a problem on 64-bit Solaris x86).

But on OS X, this should be easy to test - assuming you can find the hardware with a sufficiently old version of OS X

Jeroen.



--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to