On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 23:30, Jason Grout <jason-s...@creativetrax.com> wrote: > I use separate directories in devel/ to have multiple versions of the new > sage notebook installed. They're almost all git repositories, though :). I > don't know if that counts as a yes or no to your question.
IMO it's important to note that these directories and the symlink are managed by you (afaik), and are not ingrained into Sage's concept of what is there. This is in contrast to the Sage library, which actually causes Sage to refuse to start up unless there is a symlink $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage pointing to a directory called $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage-foo (as I discovered when writing https://github.com/sagemath/sagelib/blob/github-master/README.rst ). So I think that counts as a "no", if the question is to be interpreted as being about whether we should keep that "branch"-handling code in the Sage scripts. Though of course I don't know whether John meant it that way. -Keshav ---- Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org