Julien Puydt <julien.pu...@laposte.net> writes:
> Le jeudi 17 mai, Keshav Kini a écrit:
>> Julien Puydt <julien.pu...@laposte.net> writes:
>> > Le jeudi 17 mai, Keshav Kini a écrit:
>> >> Julien Puydt <julien.pu...@laposte.net> writes:
>> >> > It would definitely help if more sage developers knew how things
>> >> > are done in debian, fedora or gentoo -- the mail Harald Schilly
>> >> > sent yesterday and the citation therein are spot on there.
>> >> 
>> >> Knowing how things are done in Gentoo is probably the most useful
>> >> of these since Gentoo Prefix is actually something we could use as
>> >> our packaging system (as has been prototyped by Burcin's lmonade
>> >> project), rather than just learning lessons in package management
>> >> from it.
>> >
>> > Notice that rebasing sage to use gentoo prefix/lmonade still won't
>> > fix the main issue with sage : that it's not properly available in
>> > distributions but needs to be compiled (duplicating a good chunk of
>> > what's already there in the process...).
>> 
>> Yes, I agree. But moving to a Prefix build system will be a lot easier
>> than making Sage packagable by distros.
>
> Easier, perhaps, but that looks like trading Charybdis for Scylla!

Why? Doing one hardly makes it more difficult to do the other, so it's
not like choosing between alternatives.

-Keshav

----
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to