On May 26, 2012, at 7:09 PM, Benjamin Jones wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Ivan Andrus <darthand...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> No offense taken. Who knows what's going to happen after I graduate for >> example—maybe I'll get a full time job fixing bugs in Sage, or maybe I'll be >> flipping burgers. :-) >> >> It's important to remember that if it's standard someone _has_ to maintain >> it. Of course, it's also more likely that someone _will_ maintain it. >> >> -Ivan >> > > From the point of view that making sage-mode a standard package would > increase the likelihood that it is maintained, I would support it > being included as a standard package.
Do you say that because you feel it hasn't been maintained well, or that it might not be in the future since the original author has moved on? -Ivan -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
