Le 11/07/2012 15:57, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
On 2012-07-11 15:49, Jan Groenewald wrote:
I don't think it makes a big difference if I take a buildbot built binary,
or whether I make one myself
We would automatically support all systems that Launchpad supports (are
there more versions/architectures of Ubuntu on Launchpad than currently
on the Sage buildbot?)
A minor gain is that the package building would contain fewer steps (the
Sage buildbot would not be needed).
Ok, let's not panic ; this describes debian's building network, and
explains why it's necessary :
http://www.debian.org/devel/buildd/
Indeed, a *_CORRECT_* packaging of sage would make things easier :
maintainers are valuable partners of upstreams -- filtering bugs
(keeping the packaging problems for themselves, opening a single
ticket/issue even though many users reported the same thing), providing
patches, catching issues beforehand...
Snark on #sagemath
--
--
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
