On 17/03/13 10:43, Volker Braun wrote:
> Just FYI, I received an Linux/OSX Intel MKL license (its closed-source
> BLAS) for the Sage project . As I've written earlier, I'm planning to
> make Sage more vendor-agnostic so we don't have ATLAS hardcoded everywhere.
>
Cool. Is it only for you personally or can we get a generic one for
sage development?
Do you have a ticket for the ATLAS independence stuff? Or do you want
to discuss it here. I greped the log of sage-on-gentoo and I officially
declared sage-on-gentoo could use "any" BLAS in Gentoo on Friday 16th of
July 2010:
commit 44c5b767c3fe2af0b372a798d94f9021932bf6a8
Author: Fran<C3><A7>ois Bissey <f.r.bis...@massey.ac.nz>
Date: Fri Jul 16 23:00:43 2010 +1200
Sage is independent of ATLAS and can be built against other BLAS.
So if you work on that I have a deep interest in getting my
sage-on-gentoo fixes go away and be replaced by something generic upstream.
Francois
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
