On Friday, April 5, 2013 2:59:34 PM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 04/05/2013 02:40 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
> > For the minimal modification, I'd say at line 29, just after
> > {{{
> >
> > #ifndef _XMOD_H
> > #define _XMOD_H 1
> >
> > }}}
>
> I would go with the minimal modification, no need to make things more
> complicated than needed.
>
I agree.
But maybe John wants the possibility to build a version not using int64_t
at all.
That's not the case currently because of smat.cc, smat_elim.cc and svec.cc,
but the use of DMOD in xmod.h tends to show he may have tought about that
possibility at some point.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
