On Wednesday, June 19, 2013 12:37:03 PM UTC-7, Nathann Cohen wrote:

> > What exactly is your objection?
> Mainly, that the addition of a code in Sage could be justified by saying 
> that "it is needed by a third-party software, even though it has no use in 
> Sage". That's my main objection.
>

If that is the case then why are you writing a rambling page-long post 
about speed penalty of decorators? 

How about we ask somebody who actually works on combinatorics whether this 
is a useful method. If not, remove it.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to