Trust me, I  know what I'm doing ;-)

The big piece is commit b579b92... which is mostly auto-generated changes 
to the existing doctests for the new output format. Its long but not really 
that exciting. You can see it with

git show b579b92

The main work was done before that, to switch the doctesting framework 
around. To see the diff up to b579b92, you'd use

git diff 6.4.beta3...b579b92~

(note: tilde = parent commit), which isn't all that much. After that there 
are a few fixups to issues raised on the ticket, which you can summarize 
with 

git diff 1a2b1cf...7de159a


$ git log --oneline --graph trac/u/vbraun/sort_dicts_in_doctests
* 7de159a Fix more random test failures
* b362aa6 Display trailing newline in __repr__() output
* 3922ed5 Reduce doctest precision
* a9271f0 Fix doctests that have dictionary keys without stable order
* fbf83eb Show output of the lonely generic_graph doctest
* 48a2320 Also call graphics.show() in doctest mode
* 1a2b1cf Add IPython formatting to the reference manual
* b579b92 Update doctests that depended on the old displayhook
* eb6a66b Refactor our displayhook IPython integration
* a246e17 Fix printing of types
*   bdbdd5b Merge #16992 (Directly apply --fixdoctests) branch
|\  
| * 1b99c68 Also fix the cmdline doctest
| * e397b3e Add newline at end of file and fix cmdline help
| * da59f20 call git directly and from the right directory
| * 8c5f2b0 Directly overwrite with fixed doctests
| * 325da8b Updated Sage version to 6.4.beta3




On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 1:55:00 PM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote:
>
> I took a quick look and was daunted by the large number of changes, 
> many in files I never normally look at.  What's the best strategy -- 
> apart from trusting you completely? 
> Divide up the files and get a few people to look at them instead of just 
> one? 
>
> John 
>
> On 23 September 2014 13:36, Volker Braun <vbrau...@gmail.com <javascript:>> 
> wrote: 
> > bump 
> > 
> > On Thursday, September 18, 2014 9:27:18 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: 
> >> 
> >> On 2014-09-18 20:30, Volker Braun wrote: 
> >> > I would like to merge the ticket asap 
> >> > and then release the next beta. So please review ;-) 
> >> I'm not convinced that you should postpone the next beta for this. If 
> >> you think you have a candidate "next beta" now, just release it... 
> > 
> > 
> > I'm not dying to release the next beta right now, but it'll be easier 
> for 
> > other developers if there is a release with the ticket asap. 
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups 
> > "sage-devel" group. 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an 
> > email to sage-devel+...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. 
> > To post to this group, send email to sage-...@googlegroups.com 
> <javascript:>. 
> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. 
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to