On Friday, September 26, 2014 1:40:58 PM UTC-7, Snark wrote: > > > My point is that it's pretty bad for at least two reasons : > - for a long-term support perspective, that means more work following > upstream ; > - for a public relationship perspective with respect to upstream, > modifying things in their back (or worse, still proceed after asking and > getting a "no"), possibly leading to them getting direct bug reports > which don't apply to their similarly-numbered version
If we're patching pari that heavily, we should probably also patch the version number that pari provides, so that when people collect version information to supply with their bug report, the difference in version is obvious. That said, I wonder how many people use "sage -gp" to run gp. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
