> Nathann-bashing has become a game or what ?... >
Sorry, wasn't intended as Nathan-bashing: I was just referring to your previous comment. > The problem with your method is that you change all timestamps. I do > it reverse: fetch the remote branch, and merge it into develop. No > change in the timestamps. > OK, will try this in future. Of course, this doesn't work with branches that have not been pushed to trac. When push pushing to trac I guess that rebase -i should be used to prune the local commits to something reasonable. The recommended way is to stay on the old version unless you actually need > something from the latest development branch. > When the branch is finally ready for review it has to be merged with the latest development branch, so you can't avoid this indefinitely. As with Nathan, I'm reluctant to continuously switch between versions because of the compile time lag. Andrew -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
