#17679 would need rebasing.
+1 for lower priority
Francois
On 02/13/15 10:35, Volker Braun wrote:
Maybe review was the wrong word... decide on what to do.
Also the proposed stopgaps are probably a bit too broad... is the
testsuite passing with factorization disabled?
I'd propose to move it to lower priority unless there is actually
something we can do right now about it.
On Thursday, February 12, 2015 at 10:32:14 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2015-02-12 22:25, Volker Braun wrote:
> Can somebody review #17677, #17679, #17681
They aren't even set to needs_review...
Anyway, should this really be blockers? Those tickets add warnings for
bugs which are in Sage since probably a long time, so I don't see the
urgency.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
