On 29/05/15 17:46, Marc Mezzarobba wrote:
Fredrik Johansson's "Arb" library hasn't been an optional package for a full year yet, but Volker already suggested fast-tracking it to standard a while ago[1], and the (few) replies to his message were positive. Doing it now would make the development of the sage bindings a bit easier. Does anyone object to this change?
As I already mentioned on tickets, the semantic of equality is a bit different for intervals and balls. This is annoying since they basically represent the same objects (=intervals with diadic bounds). This is my only objection for having it standard right now. Otherwise, I would be very happy to have it available for many applications in other parts of Sage!
Vincent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
