On Friday, 29 May 2015 17:23:29 UTC+1, vdelecroix wrote: > > On 29/05/15 17:46, Marc Mezzarobba wrote: > > Fredrik Johansson's "Arb" library hasn't been an optional package for a > > full year yet, but Volker already suggested fast-tracking it to standard > > a while ago[1], and the (few) replies to his message were positive. > > Doing it now would make the development of the sage bindings a bit > > easier. Does anyone object to this change? > > As I already mentioned on tickets, the semantic of equality is a bit > different for intervals and balls. This is annoying since they basically > represent the same objects (=intervals with diadic bounds). This is my > only objection for having it standard right now. Otherwise, I would be > very happy to have it available for many applications in other parts of > Sage! >
well, it's not the only bit of Sage with semantics a bit different from some other bit... I don't think this should preclude arb from becoming a standard package. > Vincent > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
