On 06/11/15 14:39, William Stein wrote:
I could easily imagine Andrew and Francois and Jereon are all dutifully imagining that I know all kinds of Polybori enthusiasts and there are good reasons that Polybori really must be really well supported in Sage. However, it turns out this at least isn't clear to me.
I wouldn't make that assumption. One of potential problem is that polybori has small tentacles in other part of sage (crypto) besides rings/polynomials and surgery to remove it or make it optional won't be painless. We may be relying on polybori much more than it appears on the surface.
Francois -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
