> On 13/06/2015, at 22:00, 'Martin Albrecht' via sage-devel > <sage-devel@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > On Friday 12 Jun 2015 13:45:05 R. Andrew Ohana wrote: >> What about this: >> >> Now: We work on making polybori an optional package in sage. >> * At least going by this thread, the number of people who use polybori in >> Sage is small enough for it to make sense to have polybori as an optional >> package. > > I know I might be outvoted and I haven't volunteered to just do the work, but > I very much disagree with this. Dropping PolyBoRi as a default package makes > Sage *a lot* less useful for me. > > Why does this need to happen now?
Because it is a major blocker to getting sage ported to python 3.x. That’s currently the only dependency that doesn’t build with python 3.x. This is also the only thing using scons another currently python2 only thing that we very much want to ditch. François -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
