On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be> wrote: > On 2015-10-09 20:50, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> Good to go? I suppose we need a formal vote to make the package >> standard, right? > > > Of course. It's not clear to me that it should be standard, by the way...
Indeed -- there are questions to ask. Some random ones I instantly thought of: what is the code quality like? How portable is it? Is it going to make porting to Windows even harder (does it use a lot of POSIX stuff?)? Is it broken on OS X 10.11? How long does it take to build from source? What happens when it is running and you press control+C? Should we make it standard before we have a Cython wrapper? Is it actually better than NICE (already in Sage)...? Does it properly support 32 and 64-bit? -- William -- William (http://wstein.org) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
