On Thursday, November 5, 2015 at 5:08:15 AM UTC-6, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2015-11-05 01:26, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > > So we > > add an additional unique identifier to the cache key, the time from the > > epoch the object was created. > > That's an extremely ugly hack. If you absolutely must use a unique > identifier, generate a sufficiently large random number. >
I agree, it is an ugly hack, but it was one possible solution that I had that would keep pickling and everything else we wanted. I'm guessing a random large number is better because it won't stop working in 2038? Best, Travis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
