On 2016-04-14 15:46, Erik Bray wrote:
If truly nobody can maintain an affiliated package anymore it might die. And that's a problem since it might mean loss of functionality for users
A logical conclusion from the above that it's a simply a bad idea to split up Sage into separate packages unless somebody really cares about maintaining each of those packages. I care about cysignals since I wrote most of it, but if nobody cared we should not have split it up.
The converse should also be true: if a package is no longer actively worked on, it should be folded back into Sage core. I think this would currently be a good idea for SageNB.
Jeroen. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
