Han Frederic wrote: > Le mardi 5 juillet 2016 10:43:52 UTC+2, François a écrit : > > > Han, I have looked at both giacpy and giacpy-sage now. They hardly > have anything in common anymore. > At least, it is not obvious from the repos. > > Given that the split is already that wide, would there be an objection > to them having different “name” in setup.py so they can be installed > side by side? > > François > > > Indeed I think also that changing the name is slightly better than > managing a non conflictual installation because one could install only > the bad one. > > May be giacpysage or giacpy_sage ?
sagiac, or sagiacpy. > If so, should we change also the spkg name? (may be we should not, so > people will really upgrade?) That's not a problem, since Sage releases and specific spkg versions are now stupidly tied together (even for optional spkgs). -leif -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
