On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 9:39:28 AM UTC-7, Salvatore Stella 
wrote:
>
> * Thierry <sage-goo...@lma.metelu.net <javascript:>> [2016-09-21 
> 18:35:25]: 
>
> >Hi, 
> > 
> >bikeshedding for bikeshedding: 
> > 
> >- if we decide to centralize everything in a single file (but we should 
> be 
> >  aware that a backward move (e.g. for modularization) will require some 
> >  work), why not using bibtex (there must be some sphinx interface 
> >  somewhere), to that we keep all information with proper fields (might 
> >  also be good for pdf rendering) ? 
>
> Et VoilĂ : 
> https://sphinxcontrib-bibtex.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ 
>
>
That looks interesting. If/when we switch to a single bibliography file, 
then we could later switch to using this interface. Converting a single 
ReST bibliography file to a bibtex file would be painful but not that hard, 
and then changing all references throughout Sage from [ABC1999]_ to 
:cite:`ABC1999` could be done by a script.

-- 
John

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to