On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 9:39:28 AM UTC-7, Salvatore Stella wrote: > > * Thierry <sage-goo...@lma.metelu.net <javascript:>> [2016-09-21 > 18:35:25]: > > >Hi, > > > >bikeshedding for bikeshedding: > > > >- if we decide to centralize everything in a single file (but we should > be > > aware that a backward move (e.g. for modularization) will require some > > work), why not using bibtex (there must be some sphinx interface > > somewhere), to that we keep all information with proper fields (might > > also be good for pdf rendering) ? > > Et VoilĂ : > https://sphinxcontrib-bibtex.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ > > That looks interesting. If/when we switch to a single bibliography file, then we could later switch to using this interface. Converting a single ReST bibliography file to a bibtex file would be painful but not that hard, and then changing all references throughout Sage from [ABC1999]_ to :cite:`ABC1999` could be done by a script.
-- John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.