On 2017-03-15 11:42, Erik Bray wrote:
I don't have a strong feeling about it, but +0.5. I don't see
anything wrong with _pari_, and keeping with a _<name>_ (call it
"sunder" instead of "dunder") convention if it's already in use is the
least work.
Let me clarify some things:
(1) This is not about Sage but about a separate future project called
"cypari2". So we're not keeping any convention, we are establishing a
convention.
(2) The change to __pari__ is already implemented
(https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22470) so both _pari_ and __pari__ are
zero work at this point.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
