Define "relevant." Some do not work because of old code that needs to be lifted up to the appropriate category code. However, what might be less useful for you might be useful for someone else. In my mind, alphabetical is the best way to go because it makes it the easiest to find things.
Best, Travis On Friday, August 18, 2017 at 7:52:20 AM UTC-5, Simon Brandhorst wrote: > > What I love about Sage is the following: > > I discover an interesting class of objects say a groups. Now I want to > play with it, so I create an object foo and type "foo." + Tab and now I can > easily explore what I can do with this object. > > However many classes have 50 something methods inherited from who know > where, some work, some don't and some are even useful. > It would be nice to have the most relevant ones first and not just > alphabetical. > Is this possible? At least if I create a new class? > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
