On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 12:27:04 PM UTC-5, Jori Mäntysalo wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Aug 2017, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > > > Looks good (other than call the file something like "lattice_tests.py"). > > What if we add tests of, say, random graphs to this file? Or should we > have basically one function in one file? >
It doesn't have to necessarily be one function, but I think it would be good to keep it closer to one specific type of object (at least, I think of posets as being very different from (random) graphs). > > > Now to fully flush it out. Once all the tests are in there, we can see > > how many of them are better lifted to the category of > > FiniteLattticePosets as _tests_* methods. > > I think I didn't understood. Categories of posets ja lattices contains > just few functions. A PoC code? > > I should have said _test_* method, but any method that starts like that will be run by the TestSuite. See categories/sets_cat.py or categories/semigroups.py for example. Best, Travis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
