On Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 1:33:19 PM UTC-4, Samuel Lelievre wrote: > > Let me try to make the case for making JupyterLab a standard package. > > (1) > > According to a recent post on the Jupyter blog [0], > > - JupyterLab is ready for daily use. > - JupyterLab will eventually replace the classic Jupyter Notebook. >
"JupyterLab 1.0 will eventually replace the classic Jupyter Notebook. Throughout this transition, the same notebook document format will be supported by both the classic Notebook and JupyterLab." So do we have to yet *again* reimplement notebook interactivity? How different are they? How does that affect people wanting to upgrade their notebooks - let alone from sagenb? What about the CoCalc .sagews format? And the CoCalc Jupyter notebooks? I feel like there are some interesting unanswered questions here. Certainly optional package is fine, though, as long as it works properly on all supported platforms. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
