On 28/03/18 11:22, Simon King wrote:
As I said in an earlier post, I'd be in favour of changing printed
output of basic number types in Sage, so that pasting output will result
in a copy of the object.
A bit of future bike-shedding: I would not mind if QQ(3) be printed on
the command line as 3/1 or stay 3, but the LaTeX version is probably a
harder decision. For example,
sage: latex([bernoulli(i) for i in range(10)])
\left[1, -\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{6}, 0, -\frac{1}{30}, 0, \frac{1}{42},
0, -\frac{1}{30}, 0\right]
seems IMO nicer than having many "0/1"'s.
Regards,
TB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
