Hi Travis, On 2017-08-17, tsc...@ucdavis.edu <tsc...@ucdavis.edu> wrote: > about half of the time is in > > {method 'map_coefficients' of > 'sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_element.Polynomial' objects} > > and subfunction calls. I would say a better solution would include > improving Polynomial.map_coefficients(). It probably would benefit from > more specialized implementations, specifically sparse and dense > implementations, as well as cythonization.
What kind of polynomials is involved in that test? libsingular? Best regards, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-release@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-release. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.