Hi Travis,
On 2017-08-17, tsc...@ucdavis.edu <tsc...@ucdavis.edu> wrote:
> about half of the time is in
>
> {method 'map_coefficients' of
> 'sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_element.Polynomial' objects}
>
> and subfunction calls. I would say a better solution would include
> improving Polynomial.map_coefficients(). It probably would benefit from
> more specialized implementations, specifically sparse and dense
> implementations, as well as cythonization.
What kind of polynomials is involved in that test? libsingular?
Best regards,
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-release@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-release.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
