> > > Even the syntax of the graphs_list.show_graphs(list) is pretty thorny > > > and certainly nonintuitive compared to the rest of Sage graphics, > > > Can you give an example of what you're talking about? Given any > > arbitrary > > list of Sage objects, the only obvious choice I can think of is the > > GraphicsArray object, which usually wants a list of lists anyway. The > > whole > > reason we wrote the graphs_list set of functions was to make it easier > > to > > get nice plots of lists of graphs. It would be much easier for us to > > make > > you happy regarding this point if you could give us an example of > > other > > sage objects that act so nicely. > > Oh, I just meant as opposed to something like just typing show(list). > Again, my standard concern is "insanely easy", and hence as consistent > as possible. But I hadn't thought of the fact that these are of lists > of graphics objects, since this is a different case than when one uses > show(P+Q) or something, so I apologize for misinterpreting this; I > believe you that there probably isn't a better way to do it! I'm > sorry for it, and definitely didn't intend to be irksome.
I don't want you to be sorry, and I don't find any of this irksome, I really meant the question constructively. I didn't realize it, but the show() function is actually one of Sage's (sage/misc/functional.py), so the code that currently goes into graphs_list.show_graphs(list) could be incorporated into that. Coming soon, show(list(graphs(n))). See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1869 I'd really like to hear any other specific suggestions to improve useability. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
