On Sep 22, 4:23 pm, phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 15, 10:26 am, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
<SNIP>
> > I'll try to reproduce the crash and see what I can do about it. You could
> > help
> > by running sage -gdb (if you have gdb installed) and send me the backtrace
> > off list. Thanks.
>
> The original machine I was using was needed for other things. So, I
> ran it on sage 3.1.2rc4 on sage.math.washington.edu and it completed
> successfully after 169446 seconds. So, the problem was specific to
> the setup I was using or it was fixed in 3.1.2rc4.
> The scaling of the problem seems worse than it should be though.
> The 9x9 problem takes 40 seconds while the 10x0 problem takes 4236
> times longer. That's worse than O(n!) let along O(n^3).
> If your curious, the test problem is
> athttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/fongpwf/sage_work/determinant_10...
It would be worth it to check foe either memory leaks or something
else fishy going on here via valgrind. Let me poke around to see if I
can find anything either in Sage or in libSingular.
> Phil
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
