> > > For the record, I believe that strengthening the assume > > system would be the shortest path towards solving the > > problem which started this thread. >
I agree this would probably be easier; unfortunately, it's not clear that the set of people with time, interest, and expertise in doing either that *or* writing native Sage solve or integration is nonempty. Is there some set of threads which might give a sense of what a framework for doing so would be? There is also the issue that (at least currently) in Maxima the assumptions are explicitly not always supposed to be used (such as in solve, correct?), while most Sage users implicitly seem to desire that once they've assumed x>0, x better be greater than zero (even if that is inconsistent with something else the user types in later!). I don't know if that design difference can be easily bridged or not, though we are trying to do so in a number of cases. - kcrisman -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
