[...], and wanted to learn Cython, I decided to try and write a
Cython/Python GLPK interface.
Would it be faster, and more useful for Sage development, to modify
Sage code ?
For my purpose of learning Cython, this approach was more useful and
certainly faster.
As for this works usefulness for Sage: the numerical module is far more
than just a wrapper for GLPK (also, but not limited to, wrappers for
CBC, Gurobi, CPLEX, and a wrapper to unify them all). Such coverage
makes code modifications more difficult (much more factors to take into
account). With what I have done now, the maintainers of the numerical
module can copy the parts of the glpk.pxd file I created they deem
useful, the same goes for the glpk-constants.pxi file. The epyglpki.pyx
module is most likely too far removed from the Sage numerical
architecture to be directly useful.
Erik
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
