On Thursday, December 8, 2016 at 10:45:30 AM UTC, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > I also do not see why the released tree should not be rebased. After all, > it is merely cleaning after yourself; looks like a good idea. >
moreover, as far as we talk specifically about developing Sage library, what gets included, after reviewing, in the library are branches rebased over the current beta, possibly after some squashing---Volker knows better. Thus these un-rebased branches still exist (in Sage's git trac repo), unless one cleans them up, but they aren't very useful, as far as I am concerned - at least I think it would be pretty unusual to re-use them for anything. While I agree that in some cases rewriting repo history may be harmful, in Sage library case it seems to be done on the regular basis, and noone complains. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-support. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
