There is another possible issue with what you are trying to accomplish.
If .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.1.0 reports that there are x interfaces, it does not necessarily mean that the interfaces are numbered from 1-x.
For example, I have a 7609 that reports 199 interfaces. However, the interfaces are from 1-139, 143-145, 147-151, 153-197 & 199-205.
_____________________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 12:00 PM
To: salive@woodstone.nu
Subject: [SA-list] Cisco question
A question for the Cisco guru's on the list :-)
Is the below info correct for 'all' cisco routers?
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.1.0 give the number of interfaces
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.2.x gives the description of the different interface (x max of number of interfaces)
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.7.x gives the desired state of the interface
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8.x gives the operational state of the interface
Based on this is it correct that
IF
.1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.7.x <> .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8.x
THEN
interface is not in the state it should be?
From what I can see this seems correct for a 2501 and 4500, but I wonder if this is correct for other IOS based routers (like a 3725)
Dirk.
