-> The way we're working in v6.1 is that the IM alerts will 
-> each of them be within
-> a dll (sometimes 2) and the threading/queueing of it too.  
-> That way the updates
-> should be easy.
-> 
-> BUT if at some point we add a feature to the IM alert 
-> itself, then it won't be a
-> simple dll update anymore. 

In my case, we registered v5, and I would need to buy a new license for
v6, correct? Which I wouldn't get, until next year's budget. So I will
be using v5 for at least the rest of this year.

-> 
-> 
-> Dirk Bulinckx. 
-> -----Original Message-----
-> From: Servers Alive Discussion List 
-> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
-> Michael Shook
-> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 11:21 PM
-> To: Servers Alive Discussion List
-> Subject: RE: [SA-list] AIM alerts not being sent?
-> 
-> Just as a thought... 
-> 
-> Since the IM part of SA seems to be continually under seige 
-> as the protocols
-> shift, would it make sense for that part of SA to be 
-> "externalized" to a .dll or
-> somesuch so that upgrading that piece of it doesn't mean an 
-> upgrade to SA in
-> it's whole. I envision a separate .dll for each flavor.
-> 
-> The reason I suggest this is that it is policy in my company 
-> that ANY upgrade be
-> extensivly tested before it can be rolled into production, 
-> and NO beta software
-> be used. I suspect this policy is not so unusual.
-> Upgrading a .dll would then require quite a bit less testing 
-> than a whole new
-> version of SA and would be easier to implement when changes 
-> inevitably occur.
-> Also, it wouldn't be packaged as beta, so it could be implemented.
-> 
-> 
-> Michael D. Shook
-> Systems Analyst - Data Integration
-> Saddle Creek Corporation
-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-> 863 668 4477 (work)
-> 863 665 1261 (fax)
-> www.saddlecrk.com 
-> 
-> -----Original Message-----
-> From: Servers Alive Discussion List 
-> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
-> Dirk Bulinckx
-> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 5:06 PM
-> To: Servers Alive Discussion List
-> Subject: RE: [SA-list] AIM alerts not being sent?
-> 
-> Due to changes in the AIM protocol and changes on the AIM 
-> server we do know that
-> the AIM sending in "older" versions (even in the released 
-> v6) isn't always
-> working.  
-> In the current beta builds AIM seems to work fine again. 
-> 
-> 
-> Dirk Bulinckx. 
-> -----Original Message-----
-> From: Servers Alive Discussion List 
-> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
-> Leone, Michael
-> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 10:16 PM
-> To: Servers Alive Discussion List
-> Subject: [SA-list] AIM alerts not being sent?
-> 
-> Here's a weird one ... I set up a new AIm username, for my 
-> SA to send me AIM
-> messages at home. I have verified that the AIM username and 
-> password works (if I
-> run the AIM program on the SA server, I can log in and send 
-> messages through it
-> to others). However, when I run the test in SA, no test 
-> message is sent. I
-> (being the recipient, and logged into my own
-> AIM) see the SA username log on, then immediately log off. I 
-> see no test message
-> sent to me at all. And I see nothing in the logs, to 
-> indicate any problems. And
-> when the test fails, I get nothing - no message, no 
-> indication of log on/log
-> off.
-> 
-> 
-> SA 5.1.1964 Enterprise
-> Default messages: "%s - %c - %d"
-> 
-> 
-> Where to troubleshoot next?
-> 
-> 
-> --
-> ------------------------------------------------------------
-> Michael Leone, Systems Administrator
-> Philadelphia Contributionship
-> 210 S. 4th Street, Philadelphia, PA  19106 
-> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-> V: 215-627-1752 x1282
-> F: 215-627-5354 
->  
-> 
-> To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to 
-> [email protected]
-> If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office 
-> messages), then make sure
-> that they are not send to the list nor to the individual 
-> members of the list
-> that send a message.  Doing this will get you removed from the list.
-> 
-> To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to 
-> [email protected]
-> If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office 
-> messages), then make sure
-> that they are not send to the list nor to the individual 
-> members of the list
-> that send a message.  Doing this will get you removed from the list.
-> 
-> 
-> 
-> --------------------------------------
-> The information contained in this message is intended only 
-> for the use of the
-> addressee.  If the reader of this message is not the 
-> intended recipient or agent
-> of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
-> dissemination,
-> distribution, or copying of the message is strictly prohibited.
-> 
-> To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to 
-> [email protected]
-> If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office 
-> messages), then make sure
-> that they are not send to the list nor to the individual 
-> members of the list
-> that send a message.  Doing this will get you removed from the list.
-> 
-> To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to 
-> [email protected]
-> If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office 
-> messages), then make sure that they are not send to the list 
-> nor to the individual members of the list that send a 
-> message.  Doing this will get you removed from the list.
-> 

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to [email protected]
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), then make sure 
that they are not send to the list nor to the individual members of the list 
that send a message.  Doing this will get you removed from the list.

Reply via email to