and which part?  The BOOLEAN part or the WEIGHT one?

Dirk Bulinckx. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Weigold, Greg
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 5:50 PM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: RE: [SA-list] New check type (combined check)

Yes!

That's something I have tried to put into English for months! (and it
took a Belgian to do it!)

Nice....

:-)

Greg Weigold
Systems Administrator
Sleepmed, Inc
700 Gervais St.
Columbia, SC 29201
800-373-7326 x.434
803-779-5454 x.434
 



-----Original Message-----
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dirk
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 11:46 AM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: [SA-list] New check type (combined check)

After a little brainstorming we came up with the following idea of a new
check type and we would like to get some feedback on the idea.


A "combined" check:
        new_check is a sum of other entries, were each entry gets a
weight and you define on what weight we should give the down

        Example:
                new_check       trigger weight 5
        
                        entry_1 (ping host1)    weight 1
                        entry_11        (ping host2)    weight 2
                        entry_2 (URL http://www.something.com)  weight 4
                        entry_3 (URL http://www.somethingelse.com)
weight 4

        This means that 
                if entry_1 is down AND entry_11 is down, then new_check
gets a result of 3 (sum of 1 and 2) and gets an UP
                if entry_1 is down AND entry_2 is down, then new_check
gets a result of 5 (sum of 1 and 4) and gets a DOWN
                

We also thought about a combined BOOLEAN check
        new_check is down IF
                        (entry_1 = down          or entry_2 = down) AND
(entry_2=down or entry_3=down)


        

Would this help you in your monitoring needs?  



Dirk Bulinckx.

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to
salive@woodstone.nu If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office
messages), make sure that they are not sent to the list nor to
individual members.  Doing so will cause you to be automatically removed
from the list.

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to
salive@woodstone.nu
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that
they are not sent to the list nor to individual members.  Doing so will cause
you to be automatically removed from the list.=


To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to 
salive@woodstone.nu
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that 
they are not sent to the list nor to individual members.  Doing so will cause 
you to be automatically removed from the list.

Reply via email to