Paul Walker wrote: >Either way, the answer is "more than you'd think". I'm with whoever >suggested .saz, since it follows the .tar.gz -> .taz (or .tgz) example. Or >provide two versions of the file, or .. oh sod it, use long filenames. Who >cares anyway?
You should be able to use either, unless of course you're using DOS. I think that just for the DOS users, we could use saz for downloads. -- Stuart Brady
