Le dimanche 15 mai 2011 à 10:26 +0200, denis bonnenfant a écrit : > Le dimanche 15 mai 2011 à 00:28 +0200, Michael Wood a écrit : > > On 14 May 2011 22:09, Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 14 May 2011 19:53, RiCH <r...@richud.com> wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > Hi, > > Two years ago, I worked a bit on this. There was a lot of things to be > done for full support of regf files patching . My patches mostly worked, > but I never submitted it because I finally decided to generate .pol > files with a small python script and appmently it on client side instead > of patching regf files server-side. > > So I'm going to resurrect my old sources, rebase it on current git, and > hope it helps... As far as I remember, there was some problems with regf > format writing, and the registry files generated were sometimes > corrupted. Investigating it may be quite difficult, as regf format is > not simple and badly documented. But maybe some work was already done > yet ?
I had a look, and the merge is not straightforward. So I have work on it a little bit. Hopefully, regf code seems corrected, so I expect some good news... Denis -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
