Hi Denis, I was just wondering if any progress was made with regpatch?
Yours hopefully :) Rich On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 09:08 +0200, denis.bonnenfant wrote: > Wilco Baan Hofman a écrit : > > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 16:01 +0200, denis bonnenfant wrote: > > > >> Le mercredi 18 mai 2011 à 15:07 +0200, Wilco Baan Hofman a écrit : > >> > >>> On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:33 +0200, Michael Wood wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> Then it seems the -F option should be removed from regpatch. Or > >>>> should regpatch be replaced with something similar to the Python script > >>>> you included below? > >>>> > >> My patch adds a -K option to regpatch for specifying the predef key > >> where -F registry should be mounted. I will submit it for review soon, > >> I'm currently experimenting a little bit, and there are still some bugs > >> in .reg parsing > >> > > > > > > In fact it doesn't make sense to mount regf files to anything but HKCU , > so -K option is not necessary, and HKCU can be hardcoded as mountpoint > for files specified by -F option. > > > > I use this quite a bit and I'm aware of two bugs, which is not directly > > related to the parsing, but that on windows unicode is implicit for > > certain data types even when the data is given in binary format, it's > > still converted. The other 'bug' is that unicode .reg files are not yet > > supported. I'd be very interested to know what other bugs there are. > > > I found some problems with value deletion, sometimes values are not > deleted, reg_expand_sz data not correctly saved, but i'm not sure that > the problem is in parsing. I'm going to experiment a little bit more. > > Denis -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba