On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:14:31AM -0700, Juan Pablo wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > Thanks for your reply! > > The tests we did with the Windows 7 terminals was using smb2. > > When we enabled smb2 in samba we saw in samba logs that it > was not being used. We modified Windows 7 registry as > described in > http://www.techemperor.com/2009/09/21/manual-patch-for-windows-vistaserver-2008-smb2-flaw/ > to enable smb2 to start using smb2. Once this was done > smb2 was negotiated but there was no speed difference. > > The OS read test is done iterating from 0 to 999 a dd > if=testFile-xxx of=/dev/null bs=1k. The samba local > access test is done with smbclient from the same machine > sending the output to /dev/null. Is the speed decrease > (from 158 MB/s to 71 MB/s) from what I get when I test > from the OS to what I get with samba normal?
With smbclient you should get near wire speed. Do you have "socket options" set in your smb.conf? Volker -- SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9 AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba