Thanks Jonathan, I missed that.
So, zfsacl is provided by Oracle. Should I favor acl_xattr besides zfsacl ? Dragos On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Jonathan Buzzard <jonat...@buzzard.me.uk>wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 09:18 +0300, Pacher Dragos wrote: > > Dear list, > > > > Setup is: Solaris 11 ZFS + Samba 3.5.10 > > > > What is the recommended way nowadays of performing strict permissions > > mapping between Samba and Windows NT 6.1 ? > > And a more broader question: is it desirable ? > > > > As we know ZFS has native NFSv4 ACL's and this would mean that > permissions > > applied on Windows side should have an exact match > > on the ZFS side. > > > > Is it acl_xattr module still needed ? > > > > Example: > > [samba] > > path=/export/home/samba > > writable=yes > > vfs objects=acl_xattr > > > > By the way: acl_xattr is production ready now if I am not mistaken ? > > > > I would imagine that you want to be using the vfs_zfsacl module if you > are running on Solaris with ZFS. Note that NFSv4 ACL's don't exactly > match Windows ACL's either, though they are a close match. > > > JAB. > > -- > Jonathan A. Buzzard Email: jonathan (at) buzzard.me.uk > Fife, United Kingdom. > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
